TSXV: VCU

OTC: VCUFF

Home

3

Projects

Palmer VMS Project

Alaska, USA

Poplar Porphyry Project

BC, Canada

Additional Projects

Woodjam Project

BC, Canada

Copperview Project

BC, Canada

Redgold Project

BC, Canada

News

Media

Contact

May 19, 2026

Vizsla Copper Commences Drilling at the Woodjam Project and Provides Update on Drilling at the Poplar Project

Vancouver, British Columbia, May 19, 2026 – Vizsla Copper Corp. (TSXV: VCU, OTCQB: VCUFF, FRANKFURT: 97E0) (“Vizsla Copper” or the “Company”) is pleased to report that drilling is now underway at the Woodjam Project (the “Woodjam Project” or “Woodjam”) in central British Columbia. The program is expected to consist of up to 8,000 meters of drilling, with two rigs focused on three highly prospective target areas: Three Firs, Great Plains and Deerhorn.

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Woodjam Project - Drilling Ongoing: Up to 8,000 meters are being drilled across three target areas with a focus on new discovery, building on significant past results and resource expansion:
    • Three Firs: Drilling at the Three Firs target will focus on identifying the source of the strongly mineralized clasts in the recently discovered breccia system.
    • Great Plains: Drilling at the Great Plains target will investigate the porphyry-related copper-gold mineralization potential of an untested geophysical anomaly located approximately four kilometers south of the project’s existing Southeast deposit.
    • Deerhorn Deposit: Drilling at the Deerhorn deposit will focus on expanding the southern extent of strong copper-gold mineralization on the western limb of the deposit.
  • Poplar Project - Phase 1 Drilling Completed: Over 11,200 meters were drilled across 21 holes at the Thira, Camp Lake and Copper Pond targets. All core samples have been submitted for geochemical analysis. Phase 2 drilling at the Poplar Project will commence after all results from Phase 1 have been received and interpreted, and drilling at the Woodjam Project has been completed.

“With copper recently reaching an all-time high of US$6.60/lb., we believe the market is continuing to recognize the growing importance of new copper discoveries and development projects,” commented Craig Parry, Chair and CEO. “Against this backdrop, the Company is well-positioned with assays pending from our Thira copper discovery at the Poplar project, as well as a fully funded 8,000 m drill program underway at the Woodjam project. We believe the next few months will be a highly active and catalyst-rich period with a steady stream of meaningful news flow expected across our portfolio. As we advance these programs, we are also pleased to welcome Susy Horna to the team as Corporate Secretary and would like to sincerely thank Jen Hanson for her dedication, professionalism, and valuable contributions to the Company over the years. We wish her all the best in her future endeavours.”

“Commencement of drilling at Woodjam kicks off the next leg of a very busy year for the Company, which will also include a major drill program at Palmer, a second phase of drilling at Poplar, and the first ever drill program at Copperview.” commented Steve Blower, SVP, Exploration. “At Woodjam, we’ll focus on new discoveries at the Three Firs Breccia and Great Plains targets, and also evaluate the potential to expand the higher gold portion of the Deerhorn deposit, which remains open along strike to the southwest.”

Woodjam Drill Plan

The 2026 summer drill program at the Woodjam Project will consist of up to 8,000 meters of core drilling across ~16 drill holes focused on the highly prospective Three Firs, Great Plains and Deerhorn target areas (Figure 1). The focus of drilling at each target include:

  • Three Firs: The Three Firs target area consists of a zone of near-surface, porphyry-related copper-gold mineralization that spans at least 400 meters by 200 meters. Step-out drilling in 2024 investigated the extent of mineralization 500 meters to the northwest with two drill holes (see November 27, 2024 news release). Both drill holes intersected a new occurrence of polymictic breccia containing intrusive clasts with porphyry-related quartz-chalcopyrite±bornite stockwork. The frequency of mineralized clasts within the breccias increases with depth from hole TF24-123 to TF24-126, corresponding to an increase in copper and gold grades. The breccia in TF24-126 returned 27.6 meters of 0.18% copper and 0.13 g/t gold (see November 27, 2024 news release). Mineralization in the breccia intervals is hosted primarily in the clasts.

Recent modelling shows a general plunge of the breccia system to the southeast toward a broad and untested high-chargeability anomaly below the Three Firs porphyry center. Drilling will evaluate the anomaly for a potential center of intrusion-hosted, porphyry-related mineralization and the source of the mineralized clasts within the breccias.

  • Great Plains: The Great Plains target represents an open and untested two km by two km chargeability-high anomaly approximately 4 km south of the Southeast deposit (see October 30, 2024 news release). Southeast has a historical inferred mineral resource estimate of 221.7 million tonnes of 0.31% copper and 0.05 g/t gold1,2,4. The Great Plains target area is interpreted to be underlain by similar geology as the Southeast deposit, where porphyry-related copper-gold mineralization is hosted near the western margin of the prospective Takomkane batholith. Based on existing geophysical data, this prospective contact is interpreted to continue to the south for at least nine km, crossing the Great Plains target. The target is historically unexplored due to a ubiquitous thin veneer of glacial till that conceals the bedrock. 

Drilling at Great Plains will investigate the porphyry-related copper-gold mineralization potential of the Great Plains geophysical target. A series of drill holes are planned to test a footprint of ~750 meters by 1,000 meters.

  • Deerhorn: The Deerhorn extension target represents the southern extension of strong porphyry-related, high-grade copper-gold mineralization of the Deerhorn deposit, which has a historical inferred mineral resource of 32.8 million tonnes of 0.22% copper and 0.49 g/t gold1,3,4. Drilling in 2024 intersected 86.0 meters of 0.91 g/t gold and 0.18% copper associated with intense quartz-chalcopyrite-magnetite stockwork and sheeted veins (see September 3, 2024 news release). This drill hole, together with updated 3D modelling, demonstrated the expansion potential of Deerhorn to the south.

Drilling at Deerhorn will follow-up the 2024 program and evaluate the southern extension of mineralization on the western limb of the deposit with a series of angled drill holes. Additional drill holes to the northeast designed to test the extents of the eastern limb may also be completed.

Two diamond drill rigs have now mobilized to site and are advancing the first two drill holes of the program.

Figure 1. Map showing the location of Vizsla Copper’s Woodjam and Redgold projects in relation to Imperial Metals’ Mount Polley mine. Priority exploration targets at Woodjam are also shown.

Figure 2. Map showing compiled chargeability (induced polarization) results (800 masl depth plan) from the 3D inverted chargeability model (see October 30th, 2024 news release). Priority drill targets to be evaluated include Three Firs, Great Plains and Deerhorn.

Poplar Project Drilling Update

Phase 1 of the 2026 drill program at the Poplar Project that commenced earlier this year (see February 4, 2026 news release) is now complete. Over 11,200 meters were drilled across 21 holes at the Thira, Camp Lake and Copper Pond targets.

Results from the first two drill holes at the Thira Discovery were previously disclosed (see April 6, 2026 news release) and included the longest interval of continuous porphyry-related copper-molybdenum mineralization drilled to date at the target with 675.2 meters of 0.40% CuEq* (0.26% Cu, 0.015% Mo, 1.06 g/t Ag, and 0.04 g/t Au, TH26-151), including 435.0 meters of 0.49% CuEq* (0.31% Cu, 0.022% Mo, 1.24 g/t Ag, and 0.04 g/t Au). Phase 2 of the Poplar drill program will commence once all results from Phase 1 are received and interpreted and the drill program at the Woodjam Project is complete.

*Copper equivalent calculation (CuEq) uses metal prices of: Cu US$4.00/lb, Mo US$25.00/lb, Au US$2,500/oz and Ag US$25/oz and conceptual recoveries of Cu: 80%, Mo: 80%, Au: 70% and Ag: 65%. CuEq is provided for illustrative purpose only to show the combined grades of Cu, Mo, Au and Ag relative to copper price net of conceptual metallurgical recoveries. Composite intervals are calculated using length weighted averages above the cutoff grades noted above, with up to 20 meters of internal dilution. True thickness of the bulk-tonnage style, stockwork-hosted mineralization is unknown.

New Corporate Secretary

 

Vizsla Copper is also pleased to announce the appointment of Susy Horna to the role of Corporate Secretary, effective May 14, 2026. Originally from Peru, Susy brings numerous years of experience in the legal aspects of the mining, oil and gas and shipping industries. Prior to joining Vizsla Copper, Susy served as Manager, Corporate Records and Governance for First Majestic Silver Corp., and prior to the acquisition by First Majestic Silver Corp., as Corporate Secretary of Gatos Silver, Inc. Susy has also served as Corporate Secretary for various public and private companies within the Augusta Group of Companies, and as paralegal for Pacific Northwest LNG, Seaspan Corporation and Southwestern Resources Corp., where she was responsible for diverse matters relating to corporate and securities law, in particular, corporate governance and continuous disclosure.

 

The Company would like to sincerely thank its outgoing Corporate Secretary, Jen Hanson, for the professionalism, experience and wisdom she has brought to Vizsla Copper over the past five years and for helping to build Vizsla Copper’s strong foundations as a public company.

 

About Vizsla Copper

 

Vizsla Copper is a Cu-Au-Mo focused mineral exploration and development company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada. The Company is primarily focused on its Palmer VMS project in Southeast Alaska, and its Poplar and Woodjam porphyry-related projects in Central and Southern British Columbia. All of the Company’s projects are well situated amongst significant infrastructure. The Company’s growth strategy is focused on the exploration and development of the properties within its portfolio in addition to value accretive acquisitions. Vizsla Copper's vision is to be a responsible copper explorer and developer in the stable mining jurisdictions of Alaska and British Columbia, and it is committed to socially responsible exploration and development, working safely, ethically and with integrity.

Vizsla Copper is a spin-out of Vizsla Silver and is backed by Inventa Capital Corp., a premier investment group founded in 2017 with the goal of discovering and funding opportunities in the resource sector. Additional information about the Company is available on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and the Company’s website (www.vizslacopper.com).

Qualified Person and National Instrument 43-101 Disclosure

The Company’s disclosure of technical or scientific information in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Christopher Leslie, Ph.D., P.Geo., Technical Advisor for Vizsla Copper. Dr. Leslie is a Qualified Person as defined under the terms of National Instrument 43-101.

Some technical information contained in this release is historical in nature and has been compiled from public sources believed to be accurate. The historical technical information has not been verified by Vizsla Copper and may in some instances be unverifiable. Investors are cautioned that mineralization on adjacent properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization at Woodjam.

Contact Information: For more information, please contact:

Craig Parry, Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

Tel: (604) 364-2215 | Email: info@vizslacopper.com

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained herein contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. “Forward-looking information” includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, planned exploration activities. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or the negative connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to the Company’s planned 8,000-metre drill program at the Woodjam Project, including the anticipated focus and objectives of drilling at the Three Firs, Great Plains and Deerhorn target areas; the anticipated results and outcomes of exploration drilling at each target; the planned Phase 2 drill program at the Poplar Project and the timing of its commencement following receipt and interpretation of Phase 1 results; planned drill programs at the Palmer and Copperview projects; and the expected timing and sequencing of the Company’s upcoming exploration programs.

Such forward-looking information and statements are based on numerous assumptions, including among others, that the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated, the anticipated cost of planned exploration activities, that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable terms, that third party contractors, equipment and supplies and governmental and other approvals required to conduct the Company’s planned exploration activities will be available on reasonable terms and in a timely manner, and that commodity prices, including copper, gold and molybdenum prices, will remain at levels supportive of the Company’s planned exploration activities. Although the assumptions made by the Company in providing forward-looking information or making forward-looking statements are considered reasonable by management at the time, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate.

Forward-looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual events or results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future events or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information or statements, including, among others: negative operating cash flow and dependence on third party financing, uncertainty of additional financing, absence of current NI 43-101-compliant mineral resources or mineral reserves, the limited operating history of the Company, the influence of a large shareholder, aboriginal title and consultation issues, reliance on key management and other personnel, actual results of exploration activities being different than anticipated, changes in exploration programs based upon results, availability of third party contractors, availability of equipment and supplies, failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry, environmental risks, commodity price volatility including fluctuations in copper, gold and molybdenum prices, changes in laws and regulations, community relations and delays in obtaining governmental or other approvals.

Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information or implied by forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.  The Company undertakes no obligation to update or reissue forward-looking information as a result of new information or events except as required by applicable securities laws.

REFERENCES

  1. Summarized in: Lomas, S. (2022), NI43-101 Technical Report for the Woodjam Property Horsefly, British Columbia, Canada, https://sedarplus.ca
  2. Southeast: “NI 43-101 Technical Report for 2012 Activities on the Woodjam South Property, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia”, prepared by Ross Sherlock, PhD., P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV and Alex Trueman, P.Geo., MAusIMM CP(Geo), Gold Fields Exploration, Inc., prepared for the Former JV Partner (60:40 ownership between Fjordland Exploration Inc., and Cariboo Rose Ltd.) and WCC with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Historical Estimate on the Southeast deposit (the “Southeast Historical Estimate”) was completed by Alex Trueman, P.Geo., MAusIMM CP (Geo), Chief Resource Geologist, Gold Fields Exploration Inc. with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Southeast Historical Estimate was prepared with localized multivariate uniform conditioning, with a cutoff grade of US$8.60/t. The NSR calculation uses US$1,650/oz Au, US$3.90/lb Cu and recoveries of 69% Au and 85% Cu. The Southeast Historical Estimate was reported within a modelled open pit shell based on a price assumption of US$1,650/oz Au and US$3.90/lb Cu.
  3. Deerhorn: “NI 43-101 Technical Report for 2012 Activities on the Woodjam North Property, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia”, prepared by Ross Sherlock, PhD., P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, Jacqueline Blackwell, Ph. D., P. Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV and Twila Skinner, P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, prepared for the Former JV Partner and WCC with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Historical Estimate on the Deerhorn deposit (the “Deerhorn Historical Estimate”) was completed by Brian Wolfe (MAIG), Principal Resource Geologist, Gold Fields Australasia Pty. Ltd. with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Deerhorn Historical Estimate was prepared with localized multivariate uniform conditioning, with a cutoff grade of US$8.60/t.  The NSR calculation uses US$1,650/oz Au, US$3.90/lb Cu and recoveries of 69% Au and 85% Cu.  The Deerhorn Historical Estimate was reported within a modelled open pit shell based on a price assumption of US$1,650/oz Au and US$3.90/lb Cu.
  4. The Historical Estimates are considered historical in nature and as such are based on prior data and reports prepared by previous property owners. The reader is cautioned not to treat them, or any part of them, as current mineral resources or reserves. The Company has determined the Historical Estimates are reliable given that they are based on data collected with modern drilling and sampling methods and were completed for the Former JV Partner, and relevant to be included here in that they simply demonstrate the mineral potential of the Woodjam Project. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the Historical Estimates as current resources and Vizsla Copper is not treating the Historical Estimates as current resources.  Significant data compilation, re-drilling, re-sampling, data verification and a site visit may be required by a qualified person before the Historical Estimates can be classified as a current resource.  There can be no assurance that any of the historical mineral resources, in whole or in part, will ever become economically viable. In addition, mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.  Even if classified as a current resource, there is no certainty as to whether further exploration will result in any inferred mineral resources being upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource category. The Historical Estimates relating to inferred mineral resources were calculated using prior mining industry standard definitions and practices for estimating mineral resource and mineral reserves. Such prior definitions and practices were utilized prior to the implementation of the current standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining for mineral resource estimation, and have a lower level of confidence.

Explore Vizsla Copper

Palmer VMS Project

Explore Vizsla Copper’s flagship project in Southeast Alaska

Poplar Project

Explore Vizsla Copper’s copper-gold porphyry project in British Columbia

Investors

Access the latest presentation, news, and investor materials

COPPERVIEW PROJECT

Notes on Mineral Resource Estimate

Please advise on Copperview Disclaimers. Or we can remove the link to this content.

WOODJAM PROJECT

Notes on Woodjam Historical Estimates

The Woodjam estimates are historical estimates within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. The historical estimates are not being treated by Vizsla Copper as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

The historical estimates relate to the Southeast, Deerhorn and Takom deposits and were prepared for Gold Fields Horsefly Exploration Corp. and Consolidated Woodjam Copper Corp. with an effective date of May 15, 2013.

The Southeast historical estimate was disclosed in the technical report titled NI 43-101 Technical Report for 2012 Activities on the Woodjam South Property, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia, prepared by Ross Sherlock, Ph.D., P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, and Alex Trueman, P.Geo., MAusIMM CP(Geo), Gold Fields Exploration, Inc., with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Southeast historical estimate was completed by Alex Trueman, P.Geo., MAusIMM CP(Geo), Chief Resource Geologist, Gold Fields Exploration Inc.

The Deerhorn and Takom historical estimates were disclosed in the technical report titled NI 43-101 Technical Report for 2012 Activities on the Woodjam North Property, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia, prepared by Ross Sherlock, Ph.D., P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, Jacqueline Blackwell, Ph.D., P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, and Twila Skinner, P.Geo., Gold Fields Canada Exploration BV, with an effective date of May 15, 2013. The Deerhorn and Takom historical estimates were completed by Brian Wolfe, MAIG, Principal Resource Geologist, Gold Fields Australasia Pty. Ltd.

The Southeast and Deerhorn historical estimates were prepared using localized multivariate uniform conditioning, and the Takom historical estimate was prepared using ordinary kriging. Each historical estimate used a cut-off grade of US$8.60/t. The NSR calculation used metal price assumptions of US$1,650/oz Au and US$3.90/lb Cu and recovery assumptions of 69% Au and 85% Cu. The historical estimates were reported within modelled open pit shells based on price assumptions of US$1,650/oz Au and US$3.90/lb Cu.

Vizsla Copper considers the historical estimates relevant because they provide information regarding mineralization identified at the Woodjam Project and assist in guiding exploration planning. Vizsla Copper considers the historical estimates reliable for these limited purposes because they were prepared by qualified professionals using drilling and sampling information collected using modern methods available at the time. However, Vizsla Copper has not independently verified the historical estimates and readers should not rely on them as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.

Additional work required to verify or upgrade the historical estimates as current mineral resources may include, as applicable, data compilation, confirmation drilling, resampling, data verification, verification of historical drill hole locations and survey data, review and validation of historical QA/QC data, density verification, updated geological modelling, a site visit by a Qualified Person and preparation of a current mineral resource estimate and technical report in accordance with NI 43-101.

A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Vizsla Copper is not treating the historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. There can be no assurance that the historical estimates, in whole or in part, will ever be verified as current mineral resources or converted into mineral reserves.

POPLAR PROJECT

Notes on Poplar Historical Estimate

The Poplar estimate is a historical estimate within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. The historical estimate is based on the technical report titled Technical Report 2021 Update on the Poplar Deposit, Omineca Mining Division, British Columbia, prepared for Universal Copper Ltd. by James Ashton, P.E., SME-RM and Warren Robb, P.Geo., with a report date of September 2, 2021 and filed under Universal Copper Ltd.’s profile on SEDAR on September 8, 2021.

The historical estimate was reported at a 0.20% Cu cut-off within a modelled mineralized solid. The historical estimate comprises 152.3 million tonnes grading 0.32% Cu, 0.009% Mo, 0.09 g/t Au and 2.58 g/t Ag in the indicated category, and 139.3 million tonnes grading 0.29% Cu, 0.005% Mo, 0.07 g/t Au and 4.95 g/t Ag in the inferred category.

The historical estimate was prepared using a three-dimensional solid to constrain the interpolation of mineralization, using a 0.1% Cu grade limit as a guide. Large internal waste zones and certain post-mineral dykes were modelled. A total of 133 drill holes totaling 38,854 metres within the modelled area were used in the estimate. Copper, molybdenum, gold and silver assays within the mineralized solid were capped at 1.8% Cu, 0.16% Mo, 0.80 g/t Au and 70 g/t Ag, respectively. Five-metre composites were calculated and used for variography. Blocks were 5 m x 5 m x 10 m and were estimated for Cu, Mo, Au and Ag by ordinary kriging. Classification as indicated or inferred was based on each block’s proximity to data and grade continuity within the mineralized solid.

Vizsla Copper considers the historical estimate to be relevant because it provides information regarding the scale and grade of mineralization identified at the Poplar Project and assists in guiding future exploration and evaluation work. Vizsla Copper considers the historical estimate to be reliable for these limited purposes because it was prepared by qualified professionals using drilling, sampling and geological information available at the time and estimation methods considered reasonable when the estimate was prepared. However, Vizsla Copper has not independently verified the historical estimate and it should not be relied upon as a current mineral resource or mineral reserve.

The historical estimate used the categories “indicated” and “inferred”. These categories appear to be generally consistent with the corresponding mineral resource categories under NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards; however, Vizsla Copper has not completed the work required to verify the historical estimate as a current mineral resource.

Additional work required to verify or upgrade the historical estimate as a current mineral resource may include, as applicable, confirmation drilling, verification of historical drill hole locations and survey data, validation of the drill hole database, review and validation of historical QA/QC data, density verification, metallurgical test work, updated geological modelling, application of current CIM Definition Standards and preparation of a current mineral resource estimate and technical report in accordance with NI 43-101.

A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Vizsla Copper is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

PALMER PROJECT

Notes on Mineral Resource Estimate

(1) Mineral Resources, which are not Mineral Reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability. The deposits have been classified as Indicated and Inferred based on confidence in the geological model, drill spacing. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market or other relevant issues. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources are uncertain in nature and there has not been sufficient work to define these Inferred Mineral Resources as Indicated or Measured Resources. There is no certainty that any part of a Mineral Resource will ever be converted into reserves.

(2) Mineral resources are reported using an assumed NSR which includes prices, recoveries and payabilities cut-off grade based on metal price assumptions*, variable metallurgical recovery assumptions**, mining costs, processing costs, general and administrative (G&A) costs and variable NSR factors. Mining (US$41.3), processing (US$23.92) and G&A costs (US$11.77) and Sustaining Capital (US$15.92) totaling US$92.9/t for Underground Mining.

(*) Metal price assumptions considered for the calculation of Metal Equivalent grades are: Gold (US$/oz 2,100.00), Silver (US$/oz 28.0), Copper (US$/lb 4.50), Lead (US$/lb 0.95) and Zinc (US$/lb 1.50)

(**) Cut-off grade calculations assume variable metallurgical recoveries as a function of grade and relative metal distribution. Average metallurgical recoveries are: SW/RW Zones: Gold (76.1%), Silver (90.2%), Copper (90.3%), Lead (82.9%) and Zinc (89.2%), AG Zone: Gold (66.0%), Silver (91.0%), Copper (54.8%), Lead (83.4%) and Zinc (94.8%) .

(3) NSR Calculations for SW/RW Domains: NSR= $77.25 x %Cu + $20.32 x %Zn + $9.64 x %Pb + $0.64 x g/t Ag + $43.07 x g/t Au

(4) NSR Calculation for AG Domain: NSR=$49.04 x %Cu + $22.25 x %Zn + $10.14 x %Pb + $0.70 x g/t Ag + $37.77 x g/t Au

(5) The resources are considered to have potential for extraction using underground methodology and constrained by mineable shapes. Resources are presented undiluted and in situ and are considered to have reasonable prospects for economic extraction.

(6) Barite as reported is shown for economic potential but has not been used in the NSR value at this stage.

(7) ZnEq defined by equation SW & RW = NSR value per block / $20.32; AG = NSR value per block / $22.25 (Note Barite has been excluded from the ZnEq and NSR calculations)

(8) CuEq defined by equation SW & RW = NSR value per block / $77.25; AG = NSR value per block / $49.04 (Note Barite has been excluded from the CuEq and NSR calculations)

(9) Mineral Resources are based on validated data, which have been subjected to QA/QC analysis, using capped, composited samples at 2m. Estimation has been completed using a combination of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance estimation methodologies and classified based on confidence in the underlying data and drill spacing. Mineral resource tonnages have been rounded to reflect the precision of the estimate.

(10) The mineral resources were estimated by Benjamin Parsons, BSc , MSc Geology, MAusIMM (CP) #222568 of SRK, a Qualified Person.